PRESS
RELEASE
from
Gary
Johnson
2012 [ed.- fundraising
links deleted]
JOHNSON
CAMPAIGN
FILES FEC AND FCC COMPLAINTS OVER CBS DEBATE EXCLUSION
November 15, 2011, Santa Fe, NM
-- The Presidential campaign of former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson
is filing complaints with both the Federal Election Commission (FEC)
and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to protest Johnson’s
exclusion from Saturday’s Republican debate in South Carolina.
Citing prohibitions against corporate
contributions, the campaign’s FEC complaint makes the argument that, by
arbitrarily choosing who benefited from valuable air time during the
broadcast debate and excluding others, CBS was "directly and
significantly supporting those candidates it favors, and advocating the
nomination of one of their favorites and opposing the nomination of
Complainant, whom CBS evidently disfavors."
Similarly, in a complaint filed with the
FCC, the Johnson campaign asserts that “The public owns the airways
over which CBS broadcasts, and the public deserves to be free from
bias- favoring some candidates over others- as well as illegal support
of certain presidential candidates on national network television.
In a statement, Johnson senior campaign
advisor Ron Nielson said, "As this campaign progresses, it is clear
that nationally televised debates are having a tremendous impact.
Candidates are moving up and down in the polls with every debate,
fundraising is impacted dramatically, and Republican voters obviously
remain undecided. When one looks at the inconsistent and arbitrary
criteria networks such as CBS have used to decide who gets to be on the
stage for the debates, it is apparent that decisions are being made in
board rooms that are having the effect of 'preselecting' candidates.
"That is just wrong. We owe it to our
supporters and to the process to take this basic unfairness and clear
bias to those agencies whose job it is to insure that the power of the
airwaves is not being misused in an arbitrary manner in the Republican
nominating process."
Copies of the Johnson campaign’s complaints to the FEC and FCC are
included below.
Please contact Lizz Renda at
media@garyjohnson2012.com or
801.303.7924
to schedule an interview with Gary Johnson. For more information,
please visit
www.garyjohnson2012.com.
# # # #
About Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson: Gary Johnson, a two-term
Republican Governor of New Mexico from 1994-2002, has been a consistent
and outspoken advocate for limited, efficient government and personal
liberty.
BEFORE
THE
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMPLAINT
Gary Johnson, an American adult citizen of the State of New Mexico,
files this Complaint with the Federal Election Commission in accordance
with the provisions of 2 U.S.C. §437 (g ) (a) (1) in the belief
that
Respondents violated provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of
1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. §§431, et seq. (hereinafter, "The
Act").
RESPONDENTS
CBS, INC (hereinafter "CBS") is a corporation with principal offices at
51 West 52nd Street, New York, New York 10019 engaged in the business
of television broadcasting.
FACTS
Complainant is the former two-term Governor of the State of New Mexico,
and a nationally-recognized candidate for the nomination of the
Republican Party for President of the United States. Complainant has
participated, along with the other leading candidates (including
Governor Mitt Romney, Congresswoman Michelle Bachman, Governor Rick
Perry, Mr. Herman Cain and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, to name
a few) in debates televised on television networks other than
Respondent.
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 Respondent CBS televised on its national
network another debate, but instead of including all leading candidates
has elected to arbitrarily and capriciously exclude some candidates and
include others. In so doing, CBS is, without any other explanation,
choosing to support certain candidates. By excluding viable candidates
like Complainant, who has been included by cable networks in their
debates.
CBS is directly and significantly supporting those candidates it
favors, and advocating the nomination of one of their favorites and
opposing the nomination of Complainant, whom CBS evidently disfavors.
In so doing, CBS is making an illegal corporate in-kind contribution to
those favored candidates. The value of this contribution vastly exceeds
the contribution limit that applies to any category of lawful donor.
2 U.S.C. §431 (8) (A) (i) defines a “contribution” as “any gift,
subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value
made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for
Federal office.” No rational person could possibly argue that exposure
during an hour-long debate televised in prime time on the CBS network
is NOT something of value. Indeed, CBS sells advertising spots during
prime time for huge sums, and makes and reaps signifigant revenues in
doing so. By any standard, this airtime is a thing of value within the
ambit of that phrase in this statute. If all viable candidates were
being included in the debate that might lead to a different conclusion,
but by excluding candidates CBS disfavors –opposes—and including those
it favors –supports—Respondent is violating the Act.
# # # #
Complaint
by
Governor Gary E. Johnson to Federal Communications Commission
The Federal Communications Commission has the authority to regulate
fair access to the airwaves of broadcast by network television networks
Complainant is the former two- term Governor of the State of New
Mexico, and a nationally-recognized candidate for the nomination of the
Republican Party for President of the United States. Complainant has
participated, along with the other leading candidates (including
Governor Mitt Romney, Congresswoman Michelle Bachman, Governor Rick
Perry, Mr. Herman Cain and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, to name
a few) in debates televised on cable broadcast networks.
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 Respondent CBS- who’s broadcasts are
regulated by the FCC- televised on its national network another debate,
but instead of including all leading candidates has elected to
arbitrarily and capriciously exclude some candidates and include
others. In so doing, CBS is, without any other explanation, choosing to
favor certain candidates. By excluding viable candidates like
Complainant, who has been included by other cable networks in their
debates.
CBS is directly and significantly supporting those candidates it
favors, and advocating the nomination of one of they support and
opposing the nomination of Complainant. In so doing, CBS is making an
illegal corporate in-kind contribution to those favored candidates. The
value of this contribution – millions of dollars of publicity and
exposure vastly exceeds the contribution limit that applies to any
category of lawful donor.
2 U.S.C. §431 (8) (A) (i) defines a “contribution” as “any gift,
subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value
made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for
Federal office.” No rational person could possibly argue that exposure
during an hour-long debate televised in prime time on the CBS network
is NOT something of value.
Indeed, CBS sells advertising spots during prime time for huge sums.
Advertising—selling airtime (exposure) for money demonstrates this
value. By any standard, this airtime is a thing of value within the
ambit of that phrase in this statute. If all viable candidates were
being included in the debate that might lead to a different conclusion,
but by excluding certain candidates in including others, CBS is
illegally aiding those it includes by giving them something of
value-airtime worth millions of dollars. Corporate contributions in
this case in-kind are a violation of the Federal Election law-addressed
in a different complaint.CBS is clearly violating federal election law.
The public owns the airways over which CBS broadcasts, and the public
deserves to be free from bias- favoring some candidates over others- as
well as illegal support of certain presidential candidates on national
network television. Unfair access to the airwaves of broadcast by
network television is clearly an issue within the FCC’s mandate. The
illegal corporate contribution CBS is making in including some
candidates and not others is addressed in a separate formal complaint
to the Federal Elections Commission. The FCC should take appropriate
action against CBS.