Former Gov. Mitt Romney
“The Mantle of Leadership”
Virginia Military Institute
Lexington, VA
October 8, 2012
[remarks as prepared for delivery]
 
I particularly appreciate the introduction from my good friend and tireless campaign companion, Gov. Bob McDonnell.  He is showing what conservative leadership can do to build a stronger economy.  Thank you also Congressman Goodlatte for joining us today. And particular thanks to Gen. Peay. I appreciate your invitation to be with you today at the Virginia Military Institute.  It is a great privilege to be here at an Institution that has done so much for our nation, both in war and in peace.
 
For more than 170 years, VMI has done more than educate students.  It has guided their transformation into citizens, and warriors, and leaders.  VMI graduates have served with honor in our nation’s defense, just as many are doing today in Afghanistan and other lands.  Since the September 11th attacks, many of VMI’s sons and daughters have defended America, and I mourn with you the 15 brave souls who have been lost. I join you in praying for the many VMI graduates and all Americans who are now serving in harm’s way.  May God bless all who serve, and all who have served.
 
Of all the VMI graduates, none is more distinguished than George Marshall—the Chief of Staff of the Army who became Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense, who helped to vanquish fascism and then planned Europe’s rescue from despair. His commitment to peace was born of his direct knowledge of the awful costs and consequences of war.
 
General Marshall once said, “The only way human beings can win a war is to prevent it.”  Those words were true in his time—and they still echo in ours.
 
Last month, our nation was attacked again.  A U.S. Ambassador and three of our fellow Americans are dead—murdered in Benghazi, Libya.  Among the dead were three veterans.  All of them were fine men, on a mission of peace and friendship to a nation that dearly longs for both.  President Obama has said that Ambassador Chris Stevens and his colleagues represented the best of America.  And he is right.  We all mourn their loss.
 
The attacks against us in Libya were not an isolated incident.  They were accompanied by anti-American riots in nearly two dozen other countries, mostly in the Middle East, but also in Africa and Asia.  Our embassies have been attacked.  Our flag has been burned.  Many of our citizens have been threatened and driven from their overseas homes by vicious mobs, shouting “Death to America.” These mobs hoisted the black banner of Islamic extremism over American embassies on the anniversary of the September 11th attacks.
 
As the dust settles, as the murdered are buried, Americans are asking how this happened, how the threats we face have grown so much worse, and what this calls on America to do.  These are the right questions.  And I have come here today to offer a larger perspective on these tragic recent events—and to share with you, and all Americans, my vision for a freer, more prosperous, and more peaceful world. 
 
The attacks on America last month should not be seen as random acts.  They are expressions of a larger struggle that is playing out across the broader Middle East—a region that is now in the midst of the most profound upheaval in a century.  And the fault lines of this struggle can be seen clearly in Benghazi itself.
 
The attack on our Consulate in Benghazi on September 11th, 2012 was likely the work of forces affiliated with those that attacked our homeland on September 11th, 2001. This latest assault cannot be blamed on a reprehensible video insulting Islam, despite the Administration’s attempts to convince us of that for so long.  No, as the Administration has finally conceded, these attacks were the deliberate work of terrorists who use violence to impose their dark ideology on others, especially women and girls; who are fighting to control much of the Middle East today; and who seek to wage perpetual war on the West. 
 
We saw all of this in Benghazi last month—but we also saw something else, something hopeful.  After the attack on our Consulate, tens of thousands of Libyans, most of them young people, held a massive protest in Benghazi against the very extremists who murdered our people.  They waved signs that read, “The Ambassador was Libya’s friend” and “Libya is sorry.” They chanted “No to militias.”  They marched, unarmed, to the terrorist compound.  Then they burned it to the ground.  As one Libyan woman said, “We are not going to go from darkness to darkness.”
 
This is the struggle that is now shaking the entire Middle East to its foundation.  It is the struggle of millions and millions of people—men and women, young and old, Muslims, Christians and non-believers—all of whom have had enough of the darkness.  It is a struggle for the dignity that comes with freedom, and opportunity, and the right to live under laws of our own making.  It is a struggle that has unfolded under green banners in the streets of Iran, in the public squares of Tunisia and Egypt and Yemen, and in the fights for liberty in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Libya, and now Syria.  In short, it is a struggle between liberty and tyranny, justice and oppression, hope and despair.
 
We have seen this struggle before.  It would be familiar to George Marshall.  In his time, in the ashes of world war, another critical part of the world was torn between democracy and despotism.  Fortunately, we had leaders of courage and vision, both Republicans and Democrats, who knew that America had to support friends who shared our values, and prevent today’s crises from becoming tomorrow’s conflicts.
 
Statesmen like Marshall rallied our nation to rise to its responsibilities as the leader of the free world.  We helped our friends to build and sustain free societies and free markets.  We defended our friends, and ourselves, from our common enemies.  We led.  And though the path was long and uncertain, the thought of war in Europe is as inconceivable today as it seemed inevitable in the last century.
 
This is what makes America exceptional:  It is not just the character of our country—it is the record of our accomplishments.  America has a proud history of strong, confident, principled global leadership—a history that has been written by patriots of both parties.  That is America at its best.  And it is the standard by which we measure every President, as well as anyone who wishes to be President. Unfortunately, this President’s policies have not been equal to our best examples of world leadership.  And nowhere is this more evident than in the Middle East. 
 
I want to be very clear:  The blame for the murder of our people in Libya, and the attacks on our embassies in so many other countries, lies solely with those who carried them out—no one else.  But it is the responsibility of our President to use America’s great power to shape history—not to lead from behind, leaving our destiny at the mercy of events.  Unfortunately, that is exactly where we find ourselves in the Middle East under President Obama.
 
The relationship between the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Israel, our closest ally in the region, has suffered great strains. The President explicitly stated that his goal was to put “daylight” between the United States and Israel.  And he has succeeded.  This is a dangerous situation that has set back the hope of peace in the Middle East and emboldened our mutual adversaries, especially Iran.
 
Iran today has never been closer to a nuclear weapons capability.  It has never posed a greater danger to our friends, our allies, and to us.  And it has never acted less deterred by America, as was made clear last year when Iranian agents plotted to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador in our nation’s capital.  And yet, when millions of Iranians took to the streets in June of 2009, when they demanded freedom from a cruel regime that threatens the world, when they cried out, “Are you with us, or are you with them?”—the American President was silent.
 
Across the greater Middle East, as the joy born from the downfall of dictators has given way to the painstaking work of building capable security forces, and growing economies, and developing democratic institutions, the President has failed to offer the tangible support that our partners want and need. 
 
In Iraq, the costly gains made by our troops are being eroded by rising violence, a resurgent Al-Qaeda, the weakening of democracy in Baghdad, and the rising influence of Iran. And yet, America’s ability to influence events for the better in Iraq has been undermined by the abrupt withdrawal of our entire troop presence. The President tried—and failed—to secure a responsible and gradual drawdown that would have better secured our gains.
 
The President has failed to lead in Syria, where more than 30,000 men, women, and children have been massacred by the Assad regime over the past 20 months. Violent extremists are flowing into the fight.  Our ally Turkey has been attacked.  And the conflict threatens stability in the region.
 
America can take pride in the blows that our military and intelligence professionals have inflicted on Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, including the killing of Osama bin Laden.  These are real achievements won at a high cost.  But Al-Qaeda remains a strong force in Yemen and Somalia, in Libya and other parts of North Africa, in Iraq, and now in Syria. And other extremists have gained ground across the region.  Drones and the modern instruments of war are important tools in our fight, but they are no substitute for a national security strategy for the Middle East.
 
The President is fond of saying that “The tide of war is receding.”  And I want to believe him as much as anyone.  But when we look at the Middle East today—with Iran closer than ever to nuclear weapons capability, with the conflict in Syria threating to destabilize the region, with violent extremists on the march, and with an American Ambassador and three others dead likely at the hands of Al-Qaeda affiliates— it is clear that the risk of conflict in the region is higher now than when the President took office.
 
I know the President hopes for a safer, freer, and a more prosperous Middle East allied with the United States. I share this hope.  But hope is not a strategy.  We cannot support our friends and defeat our enemies in the Middle East when our words are not backed up by deeds, when our defense spending is being arbitrarily and deeply cut, when we have no trade agenda to speak of, and the perception of our strategy is not one of partnership, but of passivity. 
 
The greater tragedy of it all is that we are missing an historic opportunity to win new friends who share our values in the Middle East—friends who are fighting for their own futures against the very same violent extremists, and evil tyrants, and angry mobs who seek to harm us.  Unfortunately, so many of these people who could be our friends feel that our President is indifferent to their quest for freedom and dignity. As one Syrian woman put it, “We will not forget that you forgot about us.”
 
It is time to change course in the Middle East.  That course should be organized around these bedrock principles:  America must have confidence in our cause, clarity in our purpose and resolve in our might. No friend of America will question our commitment to support them… no enemy that attacks America will question our resolve to defeat them… and no one anywhere, friend or foe, will doubt America’s capability to back up our words.
 
I will put the leaders of Iran on notice that the United States and our friends and allies will prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons capability. I will not hesitate to impose new sanctions on Iran, and will tighten the sanctions we currently have. I will restore the permanent presence of aircraft carrier task forces in both the Eastern Mediterranean and the Gulf region—and work with Israel to increase our military assistance and coordination.  For the sake of peace, we must make clear to Iran through actions—not just words—that their nuclear pursuit will not be tolerated.
 
I will reaffirm our historic ties to Israel and our abiding commitment to its security—the world must never see any daylight between our two nations.
 
I will deepen our critical cooperation with our partners in the Gulf.
 
And I will roll back President Obama’s deep and arbitrary cuts to our national defense that would devastate our military. I will make the critical defense investments that we need to remain secure.  The decisions we make today will determine our ability to protect America tomorrow.  The first purpose of a strong military is to prevent war.
 
The size of our Navy is at levels not seen since 1916. I will restore our Navy to the size needed to fulfill our missions by building 15 ships per year, including three submarines.  I will implement effective missile defenses to protect against threats. And on this, there will be no flexibility with Vladimir Putin. And I will call on our NATO allies to keep the greatest military alliance in history strong by honoring their commitment to each devote 2 percent of their GDP to security spending. Today, only 3 of the 28 NATO nations meet this benchmark.
 
I will make further reforms to our foreign assistance to create incentives for good governance, free enterprise, and greater trade, in the Middle East and beyond. I will organize all assistance efforts in the greater Middle East under one official with responsibility and accountability to prioritize efforts and produce results.  I will rally our friends and allies to match our generosity with theirs.  And I will make it clear to the recipients of our aid that, in return for our material support, they must meet the responsibilities of every decent modern government—to respect the rights of all of their citizens, including women and minorities… to ensure space for civil society, a free media, political parties, and an independent judiciary… and to abide by their international commitments to protect our diplomats and our property.
 
I will champion free trade and restore it as a critical element of our strategy, both in the Middle East and across the world.  The President has not signed one new free trade agreement in the past four years.  I will reverse that failure.  I will work with nations around the world that are committed to the principles of free enterprise, expanding existing relationships and establishing new ones.
 
I will support friends across the Middle East who share our values, but need help defending them and their sovereignty against our common enemies.
 
In Libya, I will support the Libyan people’s efforts to forge a lasting government that represents all of them, and I will vigorously pursue the terrorists who attacked our consulate in Benghazi and killed Americans.  
 
In Egypt, I will use our influence—including clear conditions on our aid—to urge the new government to represent all Egyptians, to build democratic institutions, and to maintain its peace treaty with Israel. And we must persuade our friends and allies to place similar stipulations on their aid.
 
In Syria, I will work with our partners to identify and organize those members of the opposition who share our values and ensure they obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters, and fighter jets. Iran is sending arms to Assad because they know his downfall would be a strategic defeat for them.  We should be working no less vigorously with our international partners to support the many Syrians who would deliver that defeat to Iran—rather than sitting on the sidelines.  It is essential that we develop influence with those forces in Syria that will one day lead a country that sits at the heart of the Middle East. 
 
And in Afghanistan, I will pursue a real and successful transition to Afghan security forces by the end of 2014.  President Obama would have you believe that anyone who disagrees with his decisions in Afghanistan is arguing for endless war. But the route to more war – and to potential attacks here at home – is a politically timed retreat that abandons the Afghan people to the same extremists who ravaged their country and used it to launch the attacks of 9/11.  I will evaluate conditions on the ground and weigh the best advice of our military commanders. And I will affirm that my duty is not to my political prospects, but to the security of the nation.
 
Finally, I will recommit America to the goal of a democratic, prosperous Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with the Jewish state of Israel.  On this vital issue, the President has failed, and what should be a negotiation process has devolved into a series of heated disputes at the United Nations. In this old conflict, as in every challenge we face in the Middle East, only a new President will bring the chance to begin anew.
 
There is a longing for American leadership in the Middle East—and it is not unique to that region.  It is broadly felt by America’s friends and allies in other parts of the world as well— in Europe, where Putin’s Russia casts a long shadow over young democracies, and where our oldest allies have been told we are “pivoting” away from them … in Asia and across the Pacific, where China’s recent assertiveness is sending chills through the region … and here in our own hemisphere, where our neighbors in Latin America want to resist the failed ideology of Hugo Chavez and the Castro brothers and deepen ties with the United States on trade, energy, and security.  But in all of these places, just as in the Middle East, the question is asked:  “Where does America stand?”
 
I know many Americans are asking a different question: “Why us?”  I know many Americans are asking whether our country today—with our ailing economy, and our massive debt, and after 11 years at war—is still capable of leading. 
 
I believe that if America does not lead, others will—others who do not share our interests and our values—and the world will grow darker, for our friends and for us.  America’s security and the cause of freedom cannot afford four more years like the last four years.  I am running for President because I believe the leader of the free world has a duty, to our citizens, and to our friends everywhere, to use America’s great influence—wisely, with solemnity and without false pride, but also firmly and actively—to shape events in ways that secure our interests, further our values, prevent conflict, and make the world better—not perfect, but better. 
 
Our friends and allies across the globe do not want less American leadership.  They want more—more of our moral support, more of our security cooperation, more of our trade, and more of our assistance in building free societies and thriving economies.  So many people across the world still look to America as the best hope of humankind.  So many people still have faith in America.  We must show them that we still have faith in ourselves—that we have the will and the wisdom to revive our stagnant economy, to roll back our unsustainable debt, to reform our government, to reverse the catastrophic cuts now threatening our national defense, to renew the sources of our great power, and to lead the course of human events.
           
Sir Winston Churchill once said of George Marshall:  “He … always fought victoriously against defeatism, discouragement, and disillusion.”  That is the role our friends want America to play again.  And it is the role we must play. 
 
The 21st century can and must be an American century. It began with terror, war, and economic calamity. It is our duty to steer it onto the path of freedom, peace, and prosperity. 
 
The torch America carries is one of decency and hope. It is not America’s torch alone. But it is America’s duty – and honor – to hold it high enough that all the world can see its light.
 
Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.
 
###

SEN. MARCO RUBIO: PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FOREIGN POLICY HAS BEEN A FAILURE

Boston, MA – Florida Senator Marco Rubio today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
"Americans need to ask themselves: what does it say about President Obama's weakness on foreign policy matters that our allies like Israel openly express frustration with him, while our enemies like Hugo Chavez openly endorse his reelection? The truth is that in every corner of the world, President Obama's foreign policy has been a failure. He failed to improve America's standing in the world, because he doesn't understand America's exceptional role in the world. Mitt Romney understands that the world is safer when America is stronger, and he'll pursue a clear and unequivocal foreign policy based on peace through strength."
SEN. JOHN MCCAIN: “I TRUST MITT ROMNEY TO LEAD”

Boston, MA – Arizona Senator John McCain today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“I trust Mitt Romney to do what’s right for our national security and the success of our values in the world.  I trust him to stand by our friends and allies and prevent our enemies from threatening the peace we seek.  And I trust him to make the necessary, prudent investments in our military to ensure that America in this century, just as in the last century, is able to defend our nation, support our friends and allies, defeat our enemies, and remain the greatest hope for peace and freedom the world has ever known.  I trust Mitt Romney to lead.  That is what America needs now in our next president.”
REP. MIKE ROGERS: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S LEAKS UNDERMINE OUR ALLIES

Boston, MA – Michigan Congressman Mike Rogers today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“American intelligence professionals around the world need to have a clear mission, clear authorities and strong support from the policy makers they serve.  But if we don’t know who we are or why we are engaged around the world, it creates confusion for our brave intelligence professionals conducting dangerous missions in dangerous places. Lives have been put in jeopardy because the Obama Administration cannot keep a secret. Intentional leaks coming out of this Administration also are intended to undermine our allies’ ability to protect themselves. This is not how you treat our friends.  A President Romney will restore the time-tested model of rewarding loyalty to the United States with loyalty from the United States.”
REP. ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN: WE NEED COURAGE AND COMMITMENT TO PROTECT OUR INTERESTS IN THE WORLD

Boston, MA – Florida Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“From the onset, President Obama has undermined U.S. interests in Latin America and the President’s approach has been to treat our adversaries with kid gloves while turning his back on our allies in the region. A Romney administration will stand by those people who seek true freedom and democracy and condemn those regimes that continue to oppress their people. We must maintain firm ties with those who share our values and priorities in order to empower and strengthen them, matching loyalty with loyalty. It takes courage and commitment to protect our security interests in the Hemisphere, a clear vision and ideological compass based on a full understanding of U.S. economic, political, and security needs in the region. You then need decisive actions to root out the mutual threats we face. Mitt Romney will provide such leadership.”
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY IS DIRECTIONLESS UNDER OBAMA

Boston, MA – South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“American foreign policy is directionless under President Obama. He has diminished our influence around the world, shaken the confidence of our friends, and emboldened those who do not share our values. Gov. Romney understands that we cannot throw off the mantle of leadership without endangering the hope for a more peaceful and prosperous world. He will stand with our friends and allies, restore the economic and military foundations of our strength, and return America to our traditional leadership role in the world.”
REP. BUCK MCKEON: MITT ROMNEY IS THE RIGHT CHOICE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE

Boston, MA – House Armed Services Chairman and California Congressman Buck McKeon today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“Today, Governor Romney offered a clear alternative to Mr. Obama's 'lead from behind' approach that has left America insecure.  Romney's peace through strength philosophy is a welcome return to American leadership in the world.  Around the globe, our embassies have been besieged, our troops are challenged by scarce resources, and our allies question America's commitment. Mitt Romney understands these aren't 'bumps in the road,' but signs that we are on the wrong track.  While the incumbent is willing to use our national security as leverage for tax increases, Governor Romney is prepared to face our challenges head on and not compound a debt crisis with a national security crisis.  From a clarity of purpose in defense of freedom, to a Defense Department set to meet the threats of the future, the contrast with the path we are on could not be more clear. I am proud to support Mitt Romney.  I know he is the right choice to keep America safe.”
PAUL RYAN: THE OBAMA FOREIGN POLICY IS UNRAVELING

“If you go home after this and turn on your TV, you will likely see the failures of the Obama foreign policy unfolding before our eyes. You see, if you look around the world, what we are witnessing is the unraveling of the Obama foreign policy.” – Paul Ryan

Remarks
Swanton, Ohio

October 8, 2012

PAUL RYAN: “If you go home after this and turn on your TV, you will likely see the failures of the Obama foreign policy unfolding before our eyes. You see, if you look around the world, what we are witnessing is the unraveling of the Obama foreign policy. Four Americans were murdered in a terrorist attack in Benghazi. The point is in a Romney administration, when we know that we are clearly attacked by terrorists, we won't be afraid to say what it is. If terrorists attack us, we will say we had a terrorist attack, and more importantly, we will do what is necessary to prevent that from happening by having a strong military, by making sure that our adversaries do not test us, do not think that we are weak and in retreat. This was not simply an isolated incident but indicative of a broader failure. Iran is closer to a nuclear weapon. The Middle East is in turmoil. Nearly two dozen nations we witness on our television screens were burning our flags in protest in riots. You see, if we project weakness abroad, our adversaries are that much more willing to test us, to question our resolve, and our allies are more hesitant to trust us. We can't afford to put more daylight between ourselves and our allies like Israel. We can't afford to equivocate when dissidents are taking to the street, arguing and fighting for peace against the tyrannical dictators that are crushing them. We can't afford to call Bashar Assad a reformer, say he has to go and then watch 20 months go by while he slaughters tens of thousands of his people. The reason we can't afford this is because if we want peace here at home in America, we need to have a strong military. And we can't afford these devastating defense cuts that the President is promising. We will reverse this. If you take all of these defense cuts that are coming due, that could lead to as many as 200,000 of our troops leaving the military.”
AMB. JOHN BOLTON: MITT ROMNEY WILL RETURN TO PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH

Boston, MA – Former Ambassador John Bolton today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“Mitt Romney understands that the best way to preserve international peace and security is for America to lead from the front.  President Obama believes that American strength is provocative, that we are too much in the world, and that a U.S. recessional is necessary and appropriate.  This is exactly opposite of what we need.  It is not our strength that is provocative, but our weakness, which our adversaries worldwide interpret to mean it is safe to challenge us. We need to reverse this dangerous American decline, and return to Ronald Reagan’s philosophy of ‘peace through strength.’  It has worked throughout our history, and it will work again under President Romney.”
SEN. JON KYL: AMERICA MUST NOT BEND IN THE WIND

Boston, MA – Arizona Senator Jon Kyl today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
"As recent events in the Middle East make plain, we are perhaps at one of the great turning points of the world order. This is not a time for America to bend to the wind, but instead we must apply our influence and our principles to shape the course of events. In his speech today, Mitt Romney set forward a vision to preserve our interests and ideals that flows directly from the best aspects of our country’s character and experience. His clear thinking, acknowledgment of history, and commitment to restore American leadership are essential for a successful foreign policy."

MISSOURI SENATOR ROY BLUNT: MITT ROMNEY IS THE MAN FOR THIS HISTORIC MOMENT

Boston, MA – U.S. Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“We're facing a historic moment in America when we'll decide who we're going to be as a nation. Mitt Romney's foreign policy strategy will restore America's leadership and influence by strengthening alliances, building new partnerships, and addressing the global threats we face.”

BOB DOLE: MITT ROMNEY HAS A CLEAR VISION FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY

Boston, MA – Former U.S. Senator Bob Dole today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
"Governor Romney has presented a clear vision for a new American century. By honoring the principles that have guided our Republic, he leaves no uncertainty or ambiguity about our exceptional role in the world. The world needs America back. And Mitt Romney has provided us that badly needed direction and resolve to restore our standing in the world.”
SEN. KELLY AYOTTE: ON NATIONAL SECURITY, THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MITT ROMNEY AND PRESIDENT OBAMA ARE STARK

Boston, MA – New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte today made the following statement on Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech:
 
“When it comes to national security and protecting the homeland, the differences between Mitt Romney and President Obama are stark. Like Ronald Reagan, Governor Romney knows America is safer and the world is more stable when America leads and maintains military power beyond challenge. Unfortunately, President Obama is more interested in managing military decline than maintaining the credibility of the U.S. military deterrent. A President Romney will ensure our country has the military that our national security requires. He will provide the American leadership, strength, and clarity that assures our allies, deters our enemies, and keeps the American people safe.”

PRE-SPEECH MEMO from Obama for America
October 8, 2012

MEMORANDUM TO INTERESTED PARTIES

 
TO:  Interested Parties
 
FR:  Michèle Flournoy and Colin Kahl, Advisors to President Obama’s Re-Election Campaign on National Security Issues
 
RE:  Mitt Romney’s Seventh Foreign Policy Speech – Finally Time for Some Specifics?
 
Since the beginning of this campaign, we have repeatedly pressed Mitt Romney to outline specific ideas about the biggest foreign policy challenges our nation is facing today. We’ve asked him to move beyond swagger and slogans to an actual strategy.
 
We have asked him to say how he would end the war in Afghanistan and bring our troops home, and how he would finish the job against al-Qaeda. We have asked him what he would do to confront Iran that President Obama is not already doing. We have asked him why he would have left tens of thousands of troops in Iraq, as he’s said both publicly and privately in his now-infamous leaked fundraiser video. And we have asked him what policies he would pursue to deal with the upheaval that has swept across the Middle East and North Africa.
 
But so far, he has failed to answer any of these questions. Today, when Mitt Romney gives his seventh speech on foreign policy issues, he has a chance to finally tell the American people what he would do as commander-in-chief, and to outline an alternative vision that voters can consider when making their choice this November. We’ll see if he’s up to the challenge.
 
The fact is that Barack Obama has one of the strongest national security records of any President in generations – he has decimated al Qaeda’s leadership, taken out Osama bin Laden, ended the war in Iraq, provided unparalleled support to Israel, produced unprecedented pressure on Iran, strengthened our alliances, and restored our standing in the world.
 
In contrast, Mitt Romney has, throughout this campaign, raised more questions than answers about what he’d actually do as President. He supported the Iraq war and said that removing all of our troops from Iraq was “tragic,” he called Russia - not al-Qaeda - our "number one geopolitical foe," and he said that he wouldn’t have set a timeline to end the war in Afghanistan. Those aren’t policies, those are misguided talking points – and the American people deserve more from someone running to be commander-in-chief.
 
Today’s latest effort to reboot and reset the Romney foreign policy doesn’t change the fact that he’s repeatedly taken positions outside of the mainstream and often to the right of even George W. Bush. This isn’t surprising. After all, Romney is advised by the same people who were responsible for some of the worst foreign policy failures in American history, including the Iraq War. And now he wants to take us back to the same with-us-or-against-us approach that got us into wars without getting us out of them.
 
For example, Governor Romney still can’t say what he’d do differently on Iran other than taking us to war. He continues to criticize the President’s timeline in Afghanistan even while saying he’d pursue it as President. His position on Libya has no credibility since he’s been both for and against our Libya policy. And he offers no way forward on Syria other than suggesting that the United States should get more deeply involved in the conflict without defining a strategy.
 
Governor Romney’s unseemly response to the tragic murder of our Ambassador in Libya raises further questions about his judgment on national security issues. Let’s acknowledge first that international crises happen during every administration, and the real question for voters is who they want to be commander-in-chief when they do. And the clear choice in this election was brought into stark relief when the situation in Benghazi unfolded.
 
Governor Romney’s first (and second and third and fourth) instinct was to play politics with the tragedy and attempt to score political points in any way he could. As Romney said he would do in that leaked fundraiser video, he has tried to take advantage of an international crisis for pure political gain. That’s not only cynical – it’s offensive.
 
Governor Romney’s response to the situation in Benghazi was calculated and irresponsible. And the American people recognized Romney’s behavior for what it was: negative editorials arguing that he is not ready to be commander-in-chief flooded newspapers in battleground states like Florida, Ohio, Virginia, and Colorado.
 
So while Governor Romney will try to convince voters today that he can speak seriously about what’s happening in Libya and the wider region, the American people have already decided how they felt about the Republican nominee’s response to this tragedy – and they didn’t like what they saw.
 
In contrast, President Obama showed statesmanlike and steady leadership – comforting the grieving families, friends, and colleagues; working with leaders in the region to call for calm and to protect our people; and pledging to bring those responsible to justice. This is the same steady leadership he has shown since the Arab revolutions began – supporting people across the region as they demand greater freedom, holding new governments accountable for their behavior, and making it clear to extremists that we will defend our citizens and our interests.
 
Needless to say, the American people know that when this President pledges to find and bring terrorists to justice, he means what he says.
 
“Mainstream” foreign policy isn’t what Mitt Romney is putting forward: wanting to keep troops in Iraq indefinitely; exploding our defense spending to levels the Pentagon has not asked for, with no way to pay for it; insulting our allies and partners around the world; and calling Russia our number-one geopolitical foe. If that’s where Mitt Romney thinks the mainstream is, he needs to find a much better compass.
 
The bar is high for Governor Romney during his speech today. After six previous chances, it is up to him to finally clear it. Because while the American people can trust Barack Obama’s strong record of winding down wars and decimating al-Qaeda, Mitt Romney has repeatedly shown that he has no idea what he’d actually do as commander-in-chief. In today’s complicated world, that’s just not good enough.