PRESS RELEASE from
Fred Karger for President
August 5, 2011
Contact: Rina Shah
Karger Scores 2% in New Harris
Interactive Poll
Enough to Qualify for Next Week's Fox News Debate
Here is a copy of the letter that was just sent to Fox News, Republican
Party of Iowa and the Washington Examiner:
August 5, 2011
Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and CEO, News Corp
Michael Clemente, Senior VP of News, Fox News
Teri Everett, Senior VP of Communications and Press Contact, News Corp
Roger Ailes, President, Fox News Channel
Brian Lewis, Senior VP of Communications and Press Contact, Fox News
Matt Strawn, Chairman, Republican Party of Iowa
Jim Kurtenbach, Co-Chair, Republican Party of Iowa
Chad Olsen, Executive Director, Republican Party of Iowa
Philip Anschutz, Owner, Washington Examiner
Michael Phelps, Publisher, Washington Examiner
Stephen Smith, Editor, Washington Examiner
Dear All:
I am a declared Republican candidate for President of the United States
who meets all of the requirements to participate in the Fox News Debate
on August 11, 2011 in Ames Iowa.
Your criteria states:
Candidates must satisfy the following by 4 p.m. CDT on Tuesday,
August 9, 2011
1. Registered with the Federal Elections Commission as a
presidential exploratory committee or presidential campaign.
2. Meet all U.S. Constitutional requirements.
3. Garnered at least an average of one percent in five national polls
based on most recent polling leading up to the registration day.
Attached is a new national poll that came out yesterday. It was
conducted by Harris Interactive, sample size 1,168 that was in the
field between August 2 – 4, 2011. The Harris Poll tested all 12
major
declared Republican candidates for President. I am at 2%, tied
with
former Governors Tim Pawlenty and Jon Huntsman. With this latest
national poll, I now meet your objective criteria of averaging at least
1% in five national polls.
Harris Interactive Poll
Harris
Interactive
Fielding Period: August
2-4, 2011
Weighted To The U.S. General Adult Population - Propensity
If
you are a registered Republican or Independent, which of the following
candidates would you be most likely to support for the Republican
nomination for President in 2012?
Base: Registered Republican/Independent
Here is the breakdown of five
polls with links, including your own Fox News poll, the first to
include me:
2%
in
Harris Poll August 4th
1% in Zogby Poll July 25th
1% in Zogby Poll May 23rd
1% Fox News Poll April 28th
I look forward to participating in the August 11, 2011 debate in Ames,
Iowa and await all details.
Thank you for hosting the Republican debates.
Best regards,
Fred Karger
www.fredkarger.com
LETTER
August 8, 2011
Mr. Michael Clemente
Senior Vice President of News
Fox News Corporation
New York, NY
via email
Dear Mr. Clemente:
We read your reply in the media to Mr. Karger’s letter of Friday,
August 5, 2011.
Even though Mr. Karger demonstrated that he met all of your prescribed
criteria to participate in Thursday’s Fox News Debate in Ames, Iowa,
you claim otherwise. Fox News is hosting the a Republican
Presidential
Debate with the Washington Examiner and the Republican Party of Iowa on
Thursday, August 11, 2011.
The Federal Election Commission allows news organizations to host
debates of Presidential candidates so long as they follow basic rules
to preserve objectivity.
Debate hosts choose candidates based upon “
pre-established, objective criteria” to ensure
that hosts do not select candidates based on favoritism or exclude
candidates for any reason.
If hosts do not choose candidates based upon “pre-established,
objective criteria,” then they are in fact making illegal in-kind
contributions to each of the campaigns of the candidates present.
The Des Moines Register reported that the
“pre-established objective criteria” were released by you on July 23,
2011, and then reaffirmed them as
final
last week. The criteria must be met by Tuesday, August 9, 2011,
4:00
pm CDT. They are very straightforward. In order to
participate in the
Fox News Debate, candidates must have:
1. Registered with the Federal Elections Commission as a presidential
exploratory committee or presidential campaign.
2. Meet all U.S. Constitutional requirements.
3. Garnered at least an average of one percent in five national polls
based on most recent polling leading up to the registration day.
Mr. Karger filed for President on March, 23, 2011 at the Federal
Election Commission in Washington, DC; he meets all U.S. Constitutional
requirements and on Friday, August 5, 2011, he achieved the required
polling criteria. He documented that in a letter sent to all
debate
sponsors
http://www.fredkarger.com/posts/update-august-5-2011.
A
Harris
Interactive Poll, which the Fred Karger for President campaign
engaged Harris to perform, came out the day before, showing Mr. Karger
at 2%. That poll, averaged with four previous recent polls,
brought
Mr. Karger to the necessary average of 1% in five national polls.
This
news was widely reported:
Des Moines Register
Huffington Post
Advocate
Washington Independent
Battleground Blog
OutQ News
Iowa Independent
Gayapolis
The Des Moines Register and OutQ News on Sirius Satellite Radio, both
reported that you released the following statement explaining why Fox
was still excluding Mr. Karger:
“None of the five polls cited by the Karger campaign help him meet the
criteria of 1%”. The August 4th Harris Interactive poll is an
online
survey. Such polls do not qualify for the purposes of meeting the
debate criteria. The July 25th Zogby poll is an online
survey. Such
polls do not qualify for the purposes of meeting the debate
criteria.
The May 23rd Zogby Poll is an online survey. Such polls do not
qualify
for the purposes of meeting the debate criteria. The April 28th
Fox
Poll is out of date. Fox offered up Mr. Karger’s name in polls
conducted in June and July, but he did not register in either.
The
June 29th McClatchy-Marist Poll shows Karger garnering “less than 1%.”
The threshold is 1%.”
Fox News never released acceptable polling companies or
acceptable polling methodology in its pre-established objective
criteria.
Now it appears that because Mr. Karger met your originally stated
criteria, Fox News is trying to change the criteria in order to exclude
him. That is in direct violation of the Federal Election
Commission
regulations. The criteria must be “pre-established,” and may not
be
changed.
CNN Debate
For comparison, CNN, the sponsor of the New Hampshire Debate on June 5,
2011, used much
more stringent polling criteria
for its debate. CNN required a candidate to poll at 2% in an
average
of three national surveys during a one-month period, and only from a
specific list of eligible polls.
Fox News has much less stringent criteria for its Iowa Debate, which we
applaud. Casey Mills, a spokesperson for the Republican Party of
Iowa,
a debate cosponsor, stated:
“The barriers for entry are very low by design to make
sure an inclusive list of candidates is featured on stage.”
Polling Criteria
Fox News regularly publishes and cites Zogby and Harris Interactive
polls, both of which are conducted online. This is a new way
national
polling firms conduct polls. Many experts consider online polls
even
more accurate than telephone polling because they take away the human
element.
Fox News often cites Zogby and Harris Interactive polls in
stories.
Fox reported on a Zogby poll that was one of the five to allow Mr.
Karger to achieve the 1% threshold that you now dismiss:
Fox News Story and
Zogby Poll Source. Fox News has cited many
other Zogby Presidential Polls conducted online:
Christie & Perry vs. Romney,
Christie and Cain and
Christie Trounces Field. Fox News also
regularly cites Harris Interactive Polls as well:
Obama's Popularity ,
Gays are more frequent Blog users and
Sony vs. Apple.
In all of its coverage of Harris Interactive and Zogby polls, Fox News
never stated that these polls were conducted online or that Fox News
viewed them to be less accurate than any other poll. Then, why
now?
Nate Silver of the New York Times analyzed the top polling companies
and found Harris Interactive
to be one of the most reliable.
The International Journal of Market Research analyzed online polling of
72 different political races in one election cycle and found that
Harris Interactive Online Polls are "twice as accurate
as its general telephone polling competition."
Fox News regularly cites other online polls: YouGov:
CLICK HERE and
HERE and Synovate:
CLICK HERE and
HERE.
Double
Standard?
You claim that your own April 29, 2011 poll (the first national poll to
include Karger) is “out of date” because subsequent Fox News Polls had
Mr. Karger at less than 1%.
Your Iowa Debate polling criteria are
identical to the criteria that you used for the South
Carolina Fox News Debate
held on May 5, 2011. Fox News accepted Gary Johnson for that
debate,
even though the April 20, 2011 Gallup Poll had him at 0%. Fox
News had
accepted previous Gallup polls from March 22, 2011 and February 20,
2011, which had Gary Johnson at 2% and 1% respectively (Sources:
Politico.com 2012 Presidential Polls and
Polling Report - White House 2012).
Fox News had to go back five months to November 14, 2010 to be able to
include Gary Johnson in the South Carolina Debate by the time Fox News
first stated Gary Johnson’s inclusion to the
Daily Beast
on the day of April 28, 2011. Mr. Karger’s Fox News poll is only
three
months before the deadline. Below is a timeline of all polls
leading
up to the South Carolina debate deadline:
April 28 - Fox News: 1% (Fox News had already
provided a list of debate participants
prior to the publication of this study and Gary Johnson was
included.
Fox News had affirmed that Gary Johnson came in at 1% in five polls
previous to this date.)
April 20, 2011 - Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 0%
April 14, 2011 - McClathy-Marist -- Gary Johnson not included
April 10, 2011 - CNN -- Gary Johnson not included
April 5, 2011 - Fox News -- Gary Johnson receives 1%
April 4, 2011 - NBC/WSJ -- Gary Johnson not included
March 28, 2011 - Farleigh Dickson University -- Gary Johnson not
included
March 22, 2011 – Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 2%
March 14, 2011 - Pew -- Gary Johnson not included
March 13, 2011 - CNN -- Gary Johnson not included
February 28, 2011 - NBC/WSJ -- Gary Johnson not included
February 20, 2011 – Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 1%
February 15, 2011 - Newsweek/Daily Beast -- Gary Johnson not included
January 23, 2011 - CNN -- Gary Johnson not included
January 16, 2011 - ABC/Washington Post -- Gary Johnson not included
December 16, 2010 - Clarus Research -- Gary Johnson not included
November 15, 2010 - McClathy-Clarist -- Gary Johnson not included
November 15, 2010 - Quinnipiac -- Gary Johnson not included
November 14, 2010 – Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 1%
The deadline for Mr. Karger’s participation is tomorrow, August 9, 2011
at 4:00 pm CDT. We hope that you will do the right thing and allow him
to be on that stage in Ames. He has met your criteria and
deserves to
be a participant. His presence would, of course, be historic as
the
first openly gay candidate to run for President of a major political
party. We eagerly look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Kevin Miniter
Research Director
Fred Karger for President
Fox
News
Cites Zogby Online Polls
"Zogby Poll: Cain takes Lead Over Romney," Fox
News,
Corresponding
Zogby Poll , which shows Fred Karger at 1%
“Poll, Both Christie, Perry Trounce Romney,” Fox News
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, the June 21st section, which shows
Fred Karger
“Poll, Christie Beats Obama,” Fox News
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, which shows Fred Karger
“Poll, Christie Crushing GOP Pack,” Fox News.
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, before Fred Karger was included
“Obama Approval Sinks 39%” Fox News.
“Poll, Clinton Loses to All Top GOP Candidates in a
Direct Match-up”, Fox News
“Bill to Grant Native Hawaiians Sovereignty Passes
House,” Fox News
“The Daily Bret – Fresh off the Vine,” Fox
News
“Sotomayor’s Confirmation Isn’t a Win for the White
House,” Fox News.
“Sean Hannity: Media Silent as Obama Vacations from
Health Care Debate” Fox
News
Fox
News
Cites Harris Online Polls
“Poll: Obama More Popular Than Jesus, Gandhi and
Martin Luther King Jr.,” Fox News.
“Gays More Frequent Blog Readers, Social Networkers,”
Fox News
“Money, Work are Top US Stressors, Survey Finds,”
Fox News
“Americans Prefer Sony, Apple Brands; Microsoft’s
Appeal Wanes,” Fox News
“Dem Proposes Letting People Opt Out of Health
Insurance Mandate,” Fox News
“Tiger Still Scores,” Fox News
“For Real Estate, a Giant Spring Clearance Sale,”
Fox News
“Tax Day 2011 – We Need a Flat Tax More Than Ever,”
Fox News
“In Strauss-Kahn Case, DA weighs Limited Options,”
Fox News
“Hillary’s Star Appeal Fading,” Fox News
“Laws to Ban Driving Under the Influence of Texting,”
Fox News.
“Chicago Most Stressed City in US, Miami Least,”
Fox News
Fox
News
Cites Other Online Polls
Synovate:
“Can You Hear Me Now? Dates Vs. Cell Phones,” Fox
News
“Looking for a Credit Card? It Pays to be Rich,”
Fox News
“Polls: Sweden’s Center-Right Government Poised for
Re-Election,” Fox News
YouGov:
“Survey: More Than 60 Percent of Arabs OK Violent
Response to Western Interference,” Fox News
“Poll: Two-Thirds of Voters Say Brown Should Step
Down,” Fox News
“Karl Rove: Obama’s Disastrous ‘Summer of Recover,’”
Fox News
“UK Leaders Face Off in Pivotal Debate,” Fox News
“Blair Ally: Britain Won’t Join War,” Fox News
PRESS RELEASE from
Fred Karger for President
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 18, 2011
Contact: Rina Shah
Karger Files 158 Page FEC Complaint Against
Murdoch and Fox News
Requests FEC
Investigation for Debate Exclusion
NEW YORK, NY - Presidential candidate Fred
Karger
today sent a 158 page sworn, notarized formal request for investigation
to the Federal Election Commission in Washington, DC protesting his
exclusion from Fox's GOP Presidential Debate last Thursday in Ames,
Iowa.
Karger had more than met Fox News Channel's
"pre-established objective criteria" when he hit the threshold of
averaging 1 percent in 5 national polls on August 4, 2011. He
communicated this to Fox executives
and the
other debate sponsors in two separate letters dated August 5, 2011
and August 8, 2011, ahead of the August 9, 2011 -
4:00 pm CDT cutoff. Fox News Channel then changed its rules so
that
Karger could not join its debate.
Today at 11:00 am EDT,
Karger personally
delivered a copy of his formal
complaint with
attachments to Mr. Murdoch at his News Corporation offices in New York.
In separate letters (copies below) to Murdoch
and
other Fox executives as well as to the six FEC Commissioners,
Karger and
his attorneys stated their case for an immediate investigation of
Fox.
The FEC was asked to expedite its investigation because Fox News is
holding its next debate on September 22, 2011 in Orlando, Florida.
Karger stated in his letter to the FEC:
“I am the first openly gay major party candidate to ever run for
President of the United States. I have experienced many doors
slammed
in my face by individuals
and
outside political organizations during the past eighteen months, but
this blatant affront by Fox News executives smacks of discrimination
and I hope the Commission will investigate
post-haste.”
August 18, 2011
Mr. Rupert Murdoch
Mr. Roger Ailes
Mr. Michael Clemente
Fox News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Enclosed please find my 158 page signed
and
notarized
complaint
that was overnighted to the Federal Election Commission in Washington,
DC today. In it, I demonstrate that Fox News Channel changed its
“pre-established, objective criteria” as soon as I submitted my August
5, 2011 letter proving that I had met all your requirements for
participation in the August 11, 2011 debate in Ames, Iowa.
Since I was not allowed to participate, the debate no longer appears
exempt from federal campaign contribution laws. That could mean
that
Fox News Channel has made illegal in-kind corporate contributions to
the eight debate participants of upwards of $100 million.
Two hours of free primetime television to an audience of 5.1 million
viewers, weeks of media coverage before
and
after the debate, facilities rental, the construction of the debate
stage, salaries, travel, insurance, equipment, the filing room, the
spin room
and so much more would all amount to
in-kind contributions to the eight presidential candidates.
We tried repeatedly over a several week period to contact Fox News
Channel personnel concerning my qualifications for the debate without
success. After I met your “pre-established objective criteria,” I
wrote two letters; one on August 5th
and the
other August 8th
and received no
response. My staff even called various Fox News Channel
offices
and bureaus repeatedly. Still no
response.
When I did not meet the criteria for your May 5, 2011 debate in
Greenville, South Carolina I did not object. When I did not meet CNN’s
very specific “pre-established objective criteria” for its June 13,
2011 debate in Manchester, New Hampshire, I did not object then
either. But when you changed the criteria after I qualified for
the
August 13th debate, I strongly object.
That is why I have requested the Federal Election Commission
investigate this entire matter. The selection of the Republican
nominee for President of the United States should be an open, honest
and fair process.
We have received a tremendous amount of encouragement from thousands of
supporters through online petitions
and
facebook comments. Thousands more have reached out to us urging
us to file this
complaint with the FEC.
I cannot let them down.
We look forward to hearing your response.
Sincerely,
Fred
Karger
August 18, 2011
Chair Cynthia Bauerly
Commissioner Caroline Hunter
Commissioner Mathew Petersen
Commissioner Donald McGahn
Commissioner Steven Walter
Commissioner Ellen Weintraub
Federal Election Commission
999 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20463
Dear Commissioners:
Please find attached my 158 page sworn
complaint
against the Fox News Channel. The respondents are Fox News
executives; Messrs. Murdoch, Ailes
and
Clemente. Because of the fast approaching date of Fox News’ next
debate on September 22, 2011 in Orlando, Florida, I do hereby request
an expedited Federal Election Commission investigation of my
complaint.
Fox News Channel, the lead sponsor of last week’s Iowa Republican
Presidential debate, released its “pre-established objective criteria”
to participate in its debate to the Des Moines Register on July 23,
2011, approximately two weeks before the August 11th debate.
1. Registered with the Federal Elections
Commission as a presidential exploratory committee or presidential
campaign
2. Meet all U.S. Constitutional
requirements
3. Garnered at least an average of one
percent in five national
polls based on most recent polling leading up to the registration day
On August 5, 2011, four days before its deadline, I met all Fox’s
criteria with the release of a Harris Interactive national poll showing
me at 2 percent. I wrote to all of the debate sponsors that day
to let
them know I qualified.
I was now in five recent national polls with an average of 1
percent.
Fox News Channel then changed its criteria just to keep me out.
As my attorneys
and I read the Federal
Election Campaign Act, by excluding me in spite of my having met its
criteria, Fox News Channel has made in-kind contributions to the eight
candidates who participated in the August 11, 2011.
I am the first openly gay major party candidate to ever run for
President of the United States. I have experienced many doors
slammed
in my face by individuals
and
outside political organizations during the past eighteen months, but
this blatant affront by Fox News executives smacks of discrimination
and I hope the Commission will investigate
post-haste.
I look forward to hearing from you in the very near future. Thank
you.
Best regards,
Fred
Karger
August 18, 2011
Office of General Counsel
Federal Election Commission
999 E Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20463
I want to bring to your attention possible violations of federal
election campaign laws by the Fox News Channel, owned by News
Corporation. The participants for Fox News Channel’s August 11,
2011
televised Presidential Debate were not selected based on
pre-established objective criteria. Specifically, I was excluded
from
this debate even though I had met Fox News Channel’s criteria.
I respectfully ask the Federal Election Commission to conduct a full
investigation into the legality of the Fox News Channel’s August 11,
2011 Presidential Debate.
Complainant
and Respondents
Complainant:
Fred
Karger
3699 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1290
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Respondents:
Rupert Murdoch, Chairman
and CEO, News Corporation
Roger Ailes, President, Fox News Channel
Michael Clemente, Senior VP of News, Fox
News
Fox News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Federal
Election Laws Concerning Candidate Appearances
Federal election campaign laws allow for an organization exempt from
taxation under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code to
sponsor a Presidential candidate meeting. Such a meeting is an
exception to the definition of contribution. Applicable rules
state
that “The debates must be structured such that they do not promote or
advance one candidate over another;
and they
must include at least two candidates, meeting face to face."
Additionally, “The organization staging the debate must select the
candidates based on pre-established objective criteria." A
qualified
organization can devise its own objective criteria.
Criteria
The Des Moines Register
reported that the “pre-established objective criteria” that Fox News
Channel used to select participants for the Iowa Presidential Debate on
July 23, 2011,
and then reaffirmed these
criteria as
final
on August 3, 2011. The criteria had to be met by Tuesday, August
9,
2011, 4:00 pm CDT. In order to participate in the Fox News
Debate,
candidates must have:
1. Registered with the Federal Elections
Commission as a presidential exploratory committee or presidential
campaign
2. Meet all U.S. Constitutional
requirements
3. Garnered at least an average of one
percent in five national
polls based on most recent polling leading up to the registration day
Casey Mills, a spokesperson for the Republican Party of Iowa, a debate
cosponsor, stated:
“The barriers for entry are very low by design to make
sure an inclusive list of candidates is featured on stage.”
Fred
Karger Met All Criteria
I filed for President on March, 23, 2011 at the Federal Election
Commission in Washington, DC; I meet all U.S. Constitutional
requirements,
and
on Friday, August 5, 2011 I achieved the required polling
criteria.
When I fulfilled the criteria, my campaign contacted all of the debate
hosts to inform them. A Harris Interactive Poll, which the
Fred
Karger
for President campaign engaged Harris to perform, came out the day
before, showing me at 2%. That poll, averaged with four previous
recent polls, brought me to the necessary average of 1% in five
national polls.
2% in Harris Interactive Poll August 4th
1% in Zogby Poll July 25th
1% in Zogby Poll May 23rd
1% Fox News Poll April 28th
Less than 1% in McClathy-Marist Poll June 29th
After first contacting Fox News Channel, I polled at 1% in an
additional Synovate poll, which was released on August 8, 2011.
Fox
News Channel Response
The Des Moines Register
and OutQ News on
Sirius Satellite Radio, both reported that Fox News Channel released
the following statement explaining why I would not be included in the
debate:
“None of the five polls cited by the
Karger
campaign help him meet the criteria of 1%”. The August 4th Harris
Interactive poll is an online survey. Such polls do not qualify for the
purposes of meeting the debate criteria. The July 25th Zogby poll
is
an online survey. Such polls do not qualify for the purposes of
meeting the debate criteria. The May 23rd Zogby Poll is an online
survey. Such polls do not qualify for the purposes of meeting the
debate criteria. The April 28th Fox Poll is out of date. Fox
offered
up Mr.
Karger’s name in polls conducted in
June
and July, but he did not register in
either. The June 29th McClatchy-Marist Poll shows
Karger garnering “less than 1%.” The threshold is
1%.”
Criteria
is re-established
Fox News Channel never released acceptable polling companies or
acceptable polling methodology in its pre-established objective
criteria.
It appears that because I met their originally stated criteria, Fox
News changed their criteria in order to exclude me. That is in direct
violation of the Federal Election Commission regulations. The
criteria
must be “pre-established,”
and may not be
changed.
CNN
Debate
By comparison, CNN, the sponsor of the New Hampshire Debate on June 5,
2011 used much
more stringent polling criteria for its
debate. CNN required a candidate to poll at 2% in an average of
three national surveys during a one-month period,
and
only from a specific list of eligible polls.
Polling
Criteria
Fox News Channel regularly publishes
and cites
Zogby
and
Harris Interactive polls, both of which are conducted online.
This is
a new way national polling firms conduct polls. Many experts
consider
online polls even more accurate than telephone polling because they
take away the human element.
Fox News Channel even reported on a Zogby poll that was one of the five
to allow me to achieve the 1% threshold that Fox News Channel later
dismissed:
Fox News Story and Zogby Poll Source. Fox News Channel has cited many
other Zogby Presidential Polls conducted online:
Christie & Perry vs. Romney,
Christie and Cain and Christie Trounces Field. Fox News Channel
also regularly cites Harris Interactive Polls as well:
Obama's Popularity, Gays are more frequent Blog users and
Sony vs. Apple. Also, Fox News Channel has
cited Synovate polls conducted online.
In all of its coverage of Harris Interactive
and
Zogby polls, Fox News Channel never stated that these polls were
conducted online or that Fox News Channel viewed them to be less
accurate than any other poll. Then, why now?
Nate Silver of the New York Times analyzed the top polling companies
and found Harris Interactive
to be one of the most reliable. The International
Journal of Market Research analyzed online polling of 72 different
political races in one election cycle
and
found that
Harris Interactive Online Polls are "twice as accurate
as its general telephone polling competition."
Double Standard?
Fox News Channel claims that its own April 29, 2011 poll (the first
national poll to include Fred
Karger) is “out
of date” because subsequent Fox News Polls had me at less than 1%.
Fox News Channel’s Iowa Debate polling criteria are
identical to the criteria that Fox News Channel used
for the South Carolina Fox News Debate
held on May 5, 2011. Fox News Channel accepted Gary Johnson for
that
debate, even though the April 20, 2011 Gallup Poll had him at 0%.
Fox
News Channel had accepted previous Gallup polls from March 22, 2011
and February 20, 2011, which had Gary Johnson at 2%
and 1% respectively. (Sources:
Politico.com 2012 Presidential Polls and Polling Report - White House 2012)
Fox News Channel had to go back five months to November 14, 2010 to be
able to include Gary Johnson in the South Carolina Debate by the time
Fox News first stated Gary Johnson’s inclusion to the
Daily Beast
on the day of April 28, 2011. The Fox News Channel poll that I cited
was released only three months before the deadline. I have
provided a
timeline of all polls leading up to the South Carolina debate deadline.
Request for Investigation
I formally request a thorough
and complete
investigation into the Fox New Channel sponsorship
and
financing of its August 9, 2011 Presidential Debate held in Ames, Iowa.
Thank you very much for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Fred
Karger
3699 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1290
Los Angeles, CA 90010
cc: Distribution
I affirm under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
April 28 - Fox News: 1% (Fox News had already
provided a list of debate participants prior to
the publication of this study
and Gary Johnson
was included. Fox News had affirmed that Gary Johnson came in at
1% in five polls previous to this date.)
April 20, 2011 - Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 0%
April 14, 2011 - McClathy-Marist -- Gary Johnson not included
April 10, 2011 - CNN -- Gary Johnson not included
April 5, 2011 - Fox News -- Gary Johnson receives 1%
April 4, 2011 - NBC/WSJ -- Gary Johnson not included
March 28, 2011 - Farleigh Dickson University -- Gary Johnson not
included
March 22, 2011 – Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 2%
March 14, 2011 - Pew -- Gary Johnson not included
March 13, 2011 - CNN -- Gary Johnson not included
February 28, 2011 - NBC/WSJ -- Gary Johnson not included
February 20, 2011 – Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 1%
February 15, 2011 - Newsweek/Daily Beast -- Gary Johnson not included
January 23, 2011 - CNN -- Gary Johnson not included
January 16, 2011 - ABC/Washington Post -- Gary Johnson not included
December 16, 2010 - Clarus Research -- Gary Johnson not included
November 15, 2010 - McClathy-Clarist -- Gary Johnson not included
November 15, 2010 - Quinnipiac -- Gary Johnson not included
November 14, 2010 – Gallup -- Gary Johnson receives 1%
Fox News Cites Zogby Online Polls
"Zogby Poll: Cain takes Lead Over Romney," Fox News,
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, which shows Fred
Karger
at 1%
“Poll, Both Christie, Perry Trounce Romney,” Fox News
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, the June 21st section, which shows
Fred
Karger
“Poll, Christie Beats Obama,” Fox News
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, which shows Fred
Karger
“Poll, Christie Crushing GOP Pack,” Fox News.
Corresponding
Zogby Poll, before Fred
Karger
was included
“Obama Approval Sinks 39%” Fox News.
“Poll, Clinton Loses to All Top GOP Candidates in a
Direct Match-up”, Fox News
“Bill to Grant Native Hawaiians Sovereignty Passes
House,” Fox News
“The Daily Bret – Fresh off the Vine,” Fox
News
“Sotomayor’s Confirmation Isn’t a Win for the White
House,” Fox News.
“Sean Hannity: Media Silent as Obama Vacations from
Health Care Debate” Fox News
Fox
News Cites Harris Online Polls
“Poll: Obama More Popular Than Jesus, Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.” Fox News.
“Gays More Frequent Blog Readers, Social Networkers,”
Fox News
“Money, Work are Top US Stressors, Survey Finds,”
Fox News
“Americans Prefer Sony, Apple Brands; Microsoft’s
Appeal Wanes,” Fox News
“Dem Proposes Letting People Opt Out of Health
Insurance Mandate,” Fox News
“Tiger Still Scores,” Fox News
“For Real Estate, a Giant Spring Clearance Sale,”
Fox News
“Tax Day 2011 – We Need a Flat Tax More Than Ever,”
Fox News
“In Strauss-Kahn Case, DA weighs Limited Options”
Fox News
“Hillary’s Star Appeal Fading” Fox News
“Laws to Ban Driving Under the Influence of Texting”
Fox News.
“Chicago Most Stressed City in US, Miami Least,”
Fox News
Fox News Cites Synovate Polls
Synovate:
“Can You Hear Me Now? Dates Vs. Cell Phones” Fox
News
“Looking for a Credit Card? It Pays to be Rich,”
Fox News
“Polls: Sweden’s Center-Right Government Poised for
Re-Election” Fox News