An Expanding, Evolving Media Universe
The
ever-expanding, ever-evolving
media universe offers a wealth of sources of information about the
upcoming
presidential campaign. As a news consumer you should try to avail
yourself of a number of
different
sources, including from time to time some you might not normally look
at. Read, view or listen with a critical eye and ear and consider
how well
the story portrays the reality of a situation or event.
Be a Discerning News Consumer
Think
about where you get your news and information from. There's a lot
of it out
there.
One can turn to the wire services, the networks, cable TV, local TV,
radio ranging from NPR to conservative talk radio, newspapers, news
magazines, opinion magazines, Internet-only news
organizations, and individual or group blogs. Further, the
editorial side of a news organization may encompass a wide range of
talent, including general assignment reporters, beat reporters,
editors, producers, photographers, videographers, columnists, feature
writers, and maybe even an editorial
cartoonist. The media are
diverse—very
diverse. Conservative talk radio presents a very different
picture of the world than do mainstream media outlets such as the New
York Times or the Washington
Post than does Joe or Jill's blog.
Among the
factors
that affect
the quality and quantity of news and election coverage a particular
outlet
presents are the available resources (financial, talent, equipment, and
commitment), the needs of advertisers and the audience, established
news
practices, habits and conventions, the peculiarities of individual
media,
and technology. Thus a local newspaper has a set of strengths and
weaknesses that differ from those of a major network.
For a given
medium, information
about the campaign can be packaged in a variety of ways. For
example,
on a network there are the flagship evening newscasts, morning shows,
magazine
programs, Sunday morning newsmaker programs, occasional specials, and
so
forth. Similarly, in a newspaper one finds hard news articles,
news
analysis, long features, lighter, "Style"-type pieces, photographs,
columns,
editorials, and editorial cartoons. Increasingly, information
must be presented
across different platforms; major
news
organizations
have found that they must develop versions for mobile devices be they
the iPad, other tablets or smartphones.
The Internet has come to play an increasingly important role in the
past two decades. Most traditional
news organizations have
established strong, integral online presences, and there are as well
Internet-only news organizations. The Internet also allows
any motivated individual to become a publisher. While some blogs
are first-rate, on top of their subject matter, others don't contribute
much beyond echoing what is already out there. In this
information age, stories are linked to and repeated, rapidly
circulate in the blogosphere, and are minutely sliced and diced.
Buzz abounds. A story may garner headlines but ultimately amount
to little more than a "tempest in a teapot," while another story of
lasting significance receives scant attention. Readers and
viewers must assess the veracity of a story as well as its importance.
Just as campaigns
vie for
support from voters, news organizations seek to gain loyalty of
viewers,
readers and surfers. Promos in their own pages or broadcasts, or
ads placed in other media highlight programming and personalities and
establish
brand identity.
Evolving Media Universe
The Internet has greatly facilitated the proliferation of information. Sites such as the Drudge Report (on the web since 1997), Newsmax.com (started in 1998), Daily Kos (2002) and The Huffington Post (May 2005) are go-to sources of information for many Americans. In addition to the news media, social media such as Facebook and Twitter have really came of age in the past several years and during the 2012 campaign. A Pew Internet & American Life Project report (>) from October 2012 found that, "Some 60% of American adults use either social networking sites like Facebook or Twitter...[and] 39% of all American adults—have done at least one of eight civic or political activities with social media."
At the same time, over the past decade-plus,
established news organizations have had to significantly pare back on
their reporting resources. The Pew Project for
Excellence in Journalism's excellent "The State of the
News Media 2013" documents "shrinking reporting power" across much
of the industry. For example, the report states, "Estimates for
newspaper newsroom cutbacks in 2012 put the industry down
30% since its peak in 2000 and below 40,000 full-time professional
employees for the first time since 1978." Magazines continue to
experience declines in ad pages and issues at newstands.
Television is affected as well; according to the report, "Across the
three cable channels, coverage of live events during the
day, which often require a crew and correspondent, fell 30% from 2007
to 2012 while interview segments, which tend to take fewer resources
and can be scheduled in advance, were up 31%." One of the
conclusions of "The
Media
and Campaign 2012," a special report in "The State of the
News Media" is that "at a
time of diminishing reporting resources, many newsmakers, in
political, public and corporate life, are finding new ways to get their
messages to the public—often with little or no journalistic vetting."
Recent years have seen immense changes in the
industry, including startups, mergers and acquisitions and
shutdowns. Some examples:
Politico
(published by Robert L. Allbritton) launched on Jan. 23, 2007, and has
become a leader in covering politics.
The Daily Beast (Tina
Brown with
millions of dollars from Barry Diller) launched on
Oct. 6, 2008.
AOL's Politics Daily started on April 27, 2009. In June 2009 AOL announced acquisition of Patch. Local Patches are now operating in hundreds of communities. In February 2010 AOL acquired The Huffington Post for $315 million (+).
The Daily
Caller (Tucker Carlson with $3 million from Foster
Friess) launched on Jan. 11, 2010.
BuzzFeed entered the
political realm, announcing the hiring Ben Smith from Politico as editor in chief in Dec.
2011.
The
Texas Tribune, "a non-profit,
nonpartisan public media organization" launched in Fall 2009, has drawn
considerable notice.
The American Independent News Network, which
traces back to 2006, has a liberal orientation, and aims for “impact
journalism”™. It started a network of
state news sites, but some of them have since closed.
The Franklin Center for Government & Public
Integrity, a 501(c)(3) dedicated to advancing transparency in
government, has launched various state watchdog.org sites.
In
February 2011 News Corporation launched The Daily, "the first national
daily news publication created from the ground up for iPad (+);" however that only lasted until
Dec. 15, 2012.
Not all print publications have experienced difficulties. The Week, a weekly news digest magazine aimed at a more upscale audience, launched in 2001 and has enjoyed considerable success in recent years.
Comcast's takeover of NBC Universal, announced on Dec. 3, 2009
(+), prompted a full year of
discussion about whether the transaction was in the public
interest before it was finally approved with conditions on Jan. 18,
2011.
In Feb. 2010 ABC News announced a "fundamental
transformation,"
including closing bureaus and expanding use of digital journalists
(+).
In July 2009, Roll Call Group,
a subsidiary of The Economist Group, acquired Congressional Quarterly,
and they have done considerable work on branding.
The National Journal Group came out with a significant redesign of its publications in Oct. 2010 (+). Newer media organizations are adjusting as well.
Finally there are the travails of Newsweek.
In
summer 2010 Sidney
Harman bought Newsweek from
The
Washington Post Company for $1, assuming a reported $70 million in
liabilities (+). In Nov.
2010, The Daily Beast and Newsweek
agreed to
merge forming "The Newsweek Daily Beast Company" (+) However, at the end of 2012 Newsweek ceased publication of its
print magazine.
Bias
Depending
on
the ideological biases of the publisher and the editorial staff,
information
may also be slanted toward or against various viewpoints. (See Media
Research Center and Media
Matters
for America). FOX News has been described as "the right-wing
echo chamber." [One interesting side note from 2010
was the fact that five potential
presidential
candidates were working as contributors or hosts on FOX News during the
year
(Huckabee, Palin, Gingrich, Bolton and Santorum). Media Matters
reported their total time in 2010 added up to 85 hours, and estimated
the time to be worth "approximately $54.7 million in free advertising."
(Jan. 24, 2010 report)]
Conservative
talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity
likewise talk to the conservative base. Meanwhile, conservatives
deride the mainstream media for presenting a one-side picture of
events. Charges of liberal or
conservative bias attract
attention, but there are other biases. For example, the
major
party
candidates are guaranteed coverage, even of their trivial activities,
while third
party candidates typically have a hard time getting coverage. A
major
underlying
bias
at
almost any news organization is simply
limited resources.
From a Campaign's Point of View
The proliferation of media presents both a challenge
and an opportunity
for campaigns as they seek to communicate their messages. They
must be able to assess and respond to requests from national political
reporters as well as local bloggers. Some interviewers throw
softballs and others curves. Campaigns not only reach out to the news media through traditional
press staff, they have new media staff producing information, graphics,
videos that supporters
will spread to friends and acquaintances through social media.
Organization and Focus
A campaign unfolds along a fixed chronological path, with clear markers along the way, and there are only so many approaches a news organization can take in covering it. There are, however, huge differences in the quality and consistency of campaign and election coverage.
For many news
organizations,
the election may not be a major focus until Election Day
approaches.
Stories about the campaign appear haphazardly here and there. A
news
organization can help its readers or viewers better understand the
campaign
if it provides some order to its coverage, for example by running its
campaign
stories in a consistent place or on specific days of the week and by
using
a recognizable graphic to draw attention to them. Regular series
of articles can also helpful.
Candidate Profiles
At different stages in the campaign, many news organizations will run in-depth profiles of the major candidates. A first set of candidate portraits typically appears early in the campaign, perhaps a couple of months before the Iowa and New Hampshire contests. After the primaries are over, heading into the conventions, the soon-to-be nominees are profiled again. Finally, toward the close of the fall campaign, a news organization may choose to run a final profile. A noteworthy example from television is Frontline's "The Choice." Writing or producing a candidate profile is a real art. Consider what anecdote is used to begin the profile, who among the candidate's realm of acquaintances is interviewed, what images are used, and how well the profile captures the essence of the subject.
Issues
It is relatively easy to report on campaign strategies and tactics, daily charges and countercharges and the latest poll results. More difficult is the task of explaining "the issues" in a fresh and understandable way. To untangle complex problems such as retirement security or tax policy, to lay out the candidates' proposals for addressing them, and to make it all relevant requires a great deal of research and thought from the reporter. Even after all that work, readers may, given human nature, skip over the well-written story on trade policy to find out about the most recent candidate controversy.
Polling
The media are firmly
addicted
to polls and devote substantial resources to conducting them.
Political
reporters argue that polling data can suggest stories. For
example
if poll numbers show a candidate is weak among particular demographic
groups,
the reporter might do a story about why this is so. Sometimes
however
it seems that reporting poll numbers is a substitute for providing
explanation
of complex issues. Horserace coverage adds nothing to
understanding
of the candidates and issues. [www.PollingReport.com-2012]
Ad Watches
Given the importance
of
TV advertising in modern-day campaigns, many news organizations now run
ad watches. These analyze the accuracy and fairness of
candidates'
claims and may provide broader information about where an ad fits in a
campaign's strategy. Ad watches have generally had a positive
effect.
Campaigns now release their ads with documented fact sheets.
However,
in the case of emotion- tugging "feel good" ads, doing an ad watch may
be comparable to trying to dissect a soap bubble.
On the Scene
In the fall, the major
party campaigns will typically institute a "protective pool"
arrangement to ensure that reporters will be on hand to cover any
activities by the candidate. The same kind of arrangement is in
place
to cover the President at the White House. The Obama campaign
instituted a protective pool on June 29, 2008; and the McCain campaign
started the arrangement on August 3, 2008. The McCain protective
pool
includes three wire reporters (AP, Reuters and Bloomberg), a wire
photographer (AP), a TV crew of three (rotation among ABC, CBS, CNN,
FOX and NBC), and a newspaper print reporter.
Media on Media
A number of news organizations have writers or reporters who focus specifically on media, or even on media and politics. This type of reporting can be quite enlightening, reminding the audience that news presents only a version of reality; it is the product of many individuals' efforts and perceptions. As another example, some newspapers have a weekly "Magazine Reader" type section which draws attention to feature articles; this can be an invaluable service for busy readers.
Endorsements
In the closing month of the campaign, many newspapers make endorsements. Newspaper endorsements may cause a significant difference in less-publicized races where voters are not familiar with the candidates or the specifics of a ballot initiative, but at the presidential level they probably do not have much impact. That is not to say a newspaper endorsement has no effect. When candidates are striving for credibility in the pre-primary period or the early primaries or seeking to persuade swing voters in the fall a newspaper endorsement may count for something. A newspaper's endorsement is generally decided by the editorial board, although sometimes the publisher may weigh in. Some newspapers have a policy of not making endorsements, at least at the presidential level. Examining the reasoning used in various papers' endorsements can offer clear insights into the candidates' strengths and weaknesses. Primary | General
Many Other Aspects
There are many other aspects of campaign coverage to consider. As an exercise, take a specific campaign event, such as a speech or a rally, and compare how a number of different news organizations cover it.
- Taegan Goddard's Political Wire
- Politico-2012 Live
- National Journal
- ABC News-Politics | The Note
- CNN-Politicker
- FOX News-Politics
- CBS News-Politics
- NBC-First Read
- The Fix [Washington Post-Chris Cillizza]
- Politics Daily-2012 Elections
- 4president.org [Mike Dec]
- GOP12 [Christian Heinze]
- Politics1-Presidency 2012
- Daryl Cagle's Political Cartoonists Index
- AAEC-Today's
Political Cartoons
- Iowa
- Des Moines
Register-Politics
- IowaPolitics.com
- Iowa Press
- O.Kay Henderson (Radio Iowa)
- WHO 1040-"Mickelson in the Morning"
- The Iowa Republican
- Montage Politics
- Politics1-IA
- New Hampshire
- Union Leader, Granite Status
- Concord Monitor-Primary Monitor | Politics
- WMUR-Politics
- GraniteGrok
- New Hampshire Watchdog
- NHInsider.com
- NH Political Report (subscription)
- NH Journal
- RedHampshire
- Politics1-NH