Controversy Over the CPD
Critics charge that the
CPD, headed by the former chairs of the Democratic National Committee
and
the Republican National Committee, is a bipartisan rather than a
nonpartisan
organization, and can scarcely be expected to be fair to third party
and
independent candidates. They also question the CPD's reliance on
corporate money and maintain that it lacks
transparency.
Clearly some limits must be set as to who will appear on the debate stage, for with too many candidates these events will become unmanageable. Starting in 2000, the CPD has used three simple criteria. (In earlier cycles, the CPD used a complicated set of "objective criteria" that drew much criticism). To participate in the debates, candidates must:
(a) be constitutionally eligible;Third party candidates have raised strong objections to their exclusion from the debates. They argue that the 15-percent threshhold is arbitrary and too high.
(b) have ballot access in enough states to win a majority of electoral votes (at least 270); and
(c) have a level of national support of at least 15 % as measured in polls done by five selected national polling organizations.
In addition to who participates there is the question of content. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has challenged the substantiveness of the CPD-sponsored debates. In an appearance in Des Moines, Iowa on Aug. 12, 2005 he called for an end to the current tightly formated presidential debates saying they "trivialize the whole process." Instead, Gingrich said, the candidates should engage in a straightforward dialogue without a moderator for 90 minutes. During a "Lincoln at Cooper Union" dialogue held on Feb. 28, 2007, Gingrich stated "I propose that we challenge every candidate in both parties to make a commitment before the nominating process begins that if they become the nominee they will agree from Labor Day to the election to nine 90 minute dialogues, one a week for nine weeks..."
Format
The format of a debate has
a critical impact on nature of the exchanges that occur and on the
amount
of information viewers are able to learn. The most obvious parameter to
consider is who is on the stage and who is not, but there are many
other
factors. Is there a live audience and are they controlled or
disruptive?
Is the subject matter confined to one area, such as the economy, or is
it more wide-ranging? What is the time limit on candidate
responses and
on rebuttals? Finally, who asks the questions? The 1960 and
1976-1988 presidential debates exclusively used the panel of
reporters.
More recently the single moderator and town hall formats have come into
favor. The town hall format was first used in the Richmond, VA
debate
in 1992. Having an audience of undecided voters pose the
questions
likely results in a broader range of questions, but on the downside
this
format does not foster follow-up. One format which has not been
attempted
is to have the candidates question each other directly.
Prep
In the lead up to the
debates,
the candidates undergo intensive preparations. Briefing books are
put together, and the candidates engage in mock debates. The
media
provide glimpses of these rehearsals. The candidates will also be
sure
to be seen engaging in public displays of confidence such as throwing a
baseball, jogging, or giving a thumbs up.
Spin
Following each debate
occurs
one of the most unique and fascinating scenes in American
politics.
Top campaign staff, campaign surrogates and party leaders gather in the
media filing center and spin reporters, telling them what they have
just
seen. On opposite sides of the filing center chairs are set up
for
Democratic and for Republican partisans to do satellite interviews with
local stations around the country. Meanwhile, during and after
the debate a rapid response
unit
works feverishly to produce rebuttals to various claims made
during the debate; these documents are distributed in the media center
and e-mailed out.
Media
In 1988 media were
criticized
for giving too much attention to the spinners. Spin soundbites
still
form an integral part of coverage, but another common element is to
assemble
a group of undecided voters and interview them for their
reactions.
Starting in 1996, the Commission on Presidential Debates has run a Debate
Watch program to encourage debate-watching groups around the
country.
These groups provide convenient opportunities for local media to do
debate coverage.
Third Party
Debates
Several third party candidate
debates typically occur. Although C-SPAN does cover some of
these, they usually
receive virtually no attention. One organization that has done
work on such events is
Free & Equal Elections.
2008 McCain-Obama |
Sept.
26,
2008 Oxford, MS |
Oct.
7,
2008 Nashville, TN |
Oct.
15,
2008 Hempstead, NY |
Palin-Biden Oct. 2, 2008 St. Louis, MO |
2004
Bush-Kerry |
Sept.
30, 2004 Coral Gables, FL |
Oct.
8,
2004 St. Louis, MO |
Oct.
13,
2004 Tempe, AZ |
Cheney-Edwards Oct. 5, 2004 Cleveland, OH |
2000
Gore-Bush |
Oct.
3,
2000 Boston, MA |
Oct.
11,
2000 Winston-Salem, NC |
Oct.
17,
2000 St. Louis, MO |
Lieberman-Cheney
Oct. 5, 2000 Danville, KY |
1996
Clinton-Dole |
Oct.
6,
1996 Hartford, CT |
Oct.
16,
1996 San Diego, CA |
. | Gore-Kemp
Oct. 9, 1996 St. Petersburg, FL |
1992 Bush-Clinton-Perot |
Oct.
11,
1992 St. Louis, MO |
Oct.
15,
1992 Richmond, VA |
Oct. 19, 1992
East Lansing, MI |
Quayle-Gore-Stockdale
Oct. 13, 1992 Atlanta, GA |
1988
Bush-Dukakis |
Sept.
25,
1988 Winston-Salem, NC |
Oct.
13,
1988 Los Angeles, CA |
. | Quayle-Bentsen
Oct. 5, 1988 Omaha, NE |
1984 Reagan-Mondale |
Oct.
7,
1984 Louisville, KY |
Oct.
21,
1984 Kansas City, MO |
. | Bush-Ferraro
Oct. 11, 1984 Philadelphia, PA |
1980
Carter-Reagan-Anderson |
Reagan-Anderson
Sept. 21, 1980 Baltimore, MD |
Carter-Reagan
Oct. 28, 1980 Cleveland, OH |
. | none |
1976
Ford-Carter |
Sept.
23,
1976 Philadelphia, PA |
Oct.
6,
1976 San Francisco, CA |
Oct.
22,
1976 Williamsburg, VA |
Dole-Mondale
Oct. 15, 1976 Houston, TX |
1960
Nixon-Kennedy |
Sept. 26, 1960 | Oct. 7, 1960 | Oct. 13, 1960 | Oct. 21, 1960 |
January 2, 2007 | 2008 Site Selection Guidelines and Application Information [PDF] issued. |
March 31, 2007 | Due date for proposals. (19 applicants) |
April-June 2007 | Site surveys scheduled and conducted by CPD production staff. |
June-September 2007 | Review of proposals and site surveys. |
November 19, 2007 | CPD announces 2008
sites,
dates,
format
and candidate selection criteria. Proposes four
90-minute debates. |
August 2, 2008 |
In
a
letter
Obama campaign manager David Plouffe accepts the CPD proposal. |
The Obama and McCain
campaigns
negotiate, Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) for Obama and Sen. Lindsey Graham
(R-SC) for McCain. |
|
August 21, 2008 | Campaigns issue a joint statement accepting four debates as outlined in the CPD proposal. (There was one difference--the original CPD proposal envisaged the first debate, at the University of Mississippi would be on domestic policy and the last debate at Hofstra University would be on foreign policy; the campaigns reversed it so the foreign policy debate would be first). |
September 21, 2008 |
CPD announces the finalized formats, describing them as "historic." |
September 26, 2008 |
First debate. |
January 6, 2003 | CPD posts 2004 site selection criteria. |
March 31, 2003 | Deadline for prospective hosts (on April 24, 2003 CPD announced that it had received proposals from 14 potential 2004 debate sites). |
September 24, 2003 |
CPD announces 2004 candidate selection criteria (the same three criteria as in 2000). |
November 6, 2003 |
CPD announces proposed 2004 sites and dates. |
June 17, 2004 |
CPD announces formats for its proposed 2004 debates. |
July 15, 2004 |
The Kerry-Edwards campaign announces its acceptance of the CPD's 2004 debate schedule. |
August 13, 2004 |
CPD announces moderators for its proposed 2004 debates. |
September 20, 2004 |
James A Baker, III and Vernon Jordan, Jr, the campaigns' debate negotiation team leaders, announce they have reached an agreement for the candidates to hold three presidential debates and one vice presidential debate. |
September 30, 2004 |
First
debate. |